skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Bad writing is a democratic problem in that it affects both the uneducated person and the over-educated one. The latter, In particular, over-educated fellows such as Ivory Tower members, who* have a hard time explaining their research in clear prose. Undoubtedly, failing to describe or defend ideas just because they are buried under poor writing is a disservice to humanity. Praise thy Web because She gives us Deirdre McCloskey, who has taken upon herself to teach some basic writing rules to theoretical minds and liberate humanity from illegible words. Her 15 rules of economic writing are a gift that every human being interested in clear prose should read. If you do not want to help yourself by spending 30 minutes on these rules, you can read a one-page summary. If you, however, want to go the whole nine yards you can read Professor McCloskey’s book, “Economical Writing.”
One of the best ways of learning about any topic is to watch a debate. Nothing like a lively debate to grasp counterintuitive arguments, detect flawed ideas, or simply test long-held beliefs. When it comes to debates, the "Oxford" style offers the most fulfilling experience. These debates consist of one side proposing a claim and the other side opposing it, usually through straight-forward argumentation. In addition, the debates include an audience and a moderator that provide pre and post debate judgments. You can see excellent Oxford-style debates for free thanks to Intelligence Square, a multimedia forum that seeks to “raise the level of public discourse on our most challenging issues.” Intelligence Square’s debates are unique in the sense that they include more than one guest on each opposing side. Moreover, typically Intelligence Square’s guests are not only experts on the day’s topic but also engaging provocative debaters. You can start experiencing Intelligence Square by watching the health care, financial crisis, and foreign policy debates.
Posts
